08-2010:Leveraged ETFs, Holding Periods and Investment Shortfalls
07-2010:The Anatomy of Principal Protected Absolute Return Notes
06-2010:What TiVo and JP Morgan teach us about Reverse Convertibles
06-2010:The Risks of Preferred Stock Portfolios
05-2010:Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund
04-2010:What Does a Mutual Fund’s Term Tell Investors?
02-2010:Auction Rate Securities
11-2009:What Does a Mutual Fund’s Average Credit Quality Tell Investors?
11-2009:Structured Products in the Aftermath of Lehman Brothers
09-2009:Leveraged Municipal Bond Arbitrage: What Went Wrong?
07-2009:Charles Schwab YieldPlus Risk
01-2009:Regions Morgan Keegan: The Abuse of Structured Finance
09-2008:An Economic Analysis of Equity-Indexed Annuities
06-2007:A CMO Primer: The Law of Conservation of Structured Securities Risk
06-2007:Closed-end Fund IPOs
06-2007:Corporate and Municipal Bonds
06-2007:Mandatory Arbitration of Securities Disputes
12-2006:Are Structured Products Suitable for Retail Investors?
06-2006:An Overview of Equity-Indexed Annuities
12-2005:Annuities
06-2005:Optimal Exercise of Employee Stock Options and Securities Arbitrations
12-2004:Concentrated Investments, Uncompensated Risk and Hedging Strategies
06-2004:The Use of Leveraged Investments to Diversify a Concentrated Position
12-2003:Mutual Fund Share Classes and Conflicts of Interest between Brokers and Investors
09-2003:Churning - Revisited: Trading Cost and Control
06-2003:Detecting Personal Trading Abuses
12-2002:Securities Class Action Lawsuits
06-2002:The Suitability of Exercise and Hold
12-2001:Churning
06-2001:Bid-Ask Spread, Sales Credits and Brokers' Compensation
12-2000:Churning - Brief Discussion
06-2000:McCann On Trading Models



Auction Rate Securities

Date: 02-2010
Author: Craig McCann, Edward O'Neal and Joseph Prendergast


Auction Rate Securities (ARS) were marketed by broker-dealers to investors, including individuals, corporations and charitable foundations as liquid, short-term, cash-equivalent investments similar to traditional commercial paper. ARS’s liquidity and similarity to short-term investments were entirely dependent on the presence of sufficient orders to buy outstanding ARS at periodic auctions in which they were bought and sold subject to a contractual ceiling on the interest rate the issuer would have to pay. If the demand for an ARS was too low to clear the market, broker dealers sponsoring the auction could place bids just below the maximum interest rate to clear the auction. The lower the public demand for an issue, the larger the quantity broker dealers had to buy to avoid a failed auction.

Participating broker dealers had better information than public investors about the creditworthiness of the ARS issuers and were the only parties with information about the broker dealers’ holdings and inclination to abandon their support of the auctions. This severe asymmetry of information made public investors in ARS vulnerable to the brokerage firms’ strategic behavior. In this paper, we explain what auction rate securities were, how they evolved, how their auctions worked, and why their flaws caused them to become illiquid securities.


Download the full working paper » (.pdf)




© 2010 Securities Litigation & Consulting Group. All Rights Reserved. info@slcg.com | Privacy Policy
3998 Fair Ridge Drive. Suite 250 Fairfax, Virginia 22033 | Main: (703) 246-9380
100 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 950 Santa Monica, California 90401 | Main: (310) 917-1075